Home/Blog/Comparison

Dispel vs SiteConduit: Which Fits Building Automation?

An honest comparison of two OT remote access platforms and where each one fits.

April 27, 2026|8 min read|Comparison

If you are evaluating secure remote access for building automation, Dispel is likely on your shortlist. They were named a Representative Vendor in Gartner's 2026 CPS Secure Remote Access Market Guide, they focus on operational technology, and they have a strong reputation in industrial environments.

The question is whether an OT remote access platform built for industrial control systems — PLCs, SCADA, HMIs — translates directly to building automation systems. The short answer: it depends on what protocols your building runs.

What Dispel does well

Dispel provides a moving-target defense approach to OT remote access. Their infrastructure randomizes network pathways, making sessions harder to intercept or target. Key strengths:

For organizations managing PLCs, SCADA systems, and industrial HMIs, Dispel is a serious platform with genuine OT security credentials.

Where Dispel stops: the BAS-specific gap

Building automation operates differently from industrial OT. BAS technicians do not access PLCs through a remote desktop. They need to:

BACnet device discovery requires Layer 2 network connectivity. WHO-IS packets are broadcast, and broadcast does not cross Layer 3 boundaries. Dispel operates at the application and session layer — it does not provide Layer 2 connectivity.

This means a BAS technician using Dispel cannot open their local copy of Niagara Workbench or CAS BACnet Explorer and discover devices on the remote network the way they would on-site. They would need to remote-desktop into a machine already on the building network — losing the ability to use their own tools and their own workstation configuration.

Feature comparison

Here is a direct comparison of the features that matter most for building automation remote access:

The BAS-specific gap

The core difference is not about security quality. Dispel is a well-built OT security platform. The gap is specificity.

Industrial OT remote access focuses on point-to-point connections to individual devices: a PLC, an HMI, a SCADA server. The technician accesses one device at a time through a brokered session.

Building automation works differently. A BAS technician often needs to interact with dozens of controllers simultaneously — running a WHO-IS scan across an entire subnet, adjusting setpoints on multiple VAV controllers, or verifying Modbus register values from a chain of energy meters. This requires network-level access, not device-level access.

As we covered in our analysis of why VPNs fail for BAS, the challenge is providing enough network access for technicians to do their work while maintaining protocol-level security controls. Too restrictive and the technician cannot do their job. Too open and you have a security gap that Gartner's framework identifies as unacceptable for CPS environments.

Use case: a 20-building portfolio

Consider a commercial real estate firm managing 20 buildings. Each has a mix of BACnet/IP controllers for HVAC, Modbus meters for energy monitoring, and Niagara JACEs as supervisory controllers. Three different integrator firms provide maintenance.

With Dispel: Each integrator connects to individual devices through brokered sessions. BACnet discovery does not work over the session — the technician must know every device IP in advance or remote-desktop into a machine on the building network. No protocol-level filtering. No automatic session expiry. No per-protocol traffic visibility.

With SiteConduit: Each building has a pre-configured CPE device connected to the BAS network. The integrator's technician opens a time-limited session (2-24 hours) through a lightweight desktop app. Their workstation joins the BACnet subnet at Layer 2. WHO-IS discovers every controller. Niagara Workbench connects to JACEs. Modbus registers are accessible. The protocol firewall allows only BACnet (UDP 47808), Modbus (TCP 502), Niagara FOX (TCP 1911/4911), and HTTPS — blocking everything else. Per-protocol traffic monitoring updates every 60 seconds. The session auto-expires.

When Dispel makes sense

Dispel is a strong choice if your environment is primarily industrial OT — PLCs, SCADA, HMIs — and remote access means connecting to individual devices one at a time. If you do not need BACnet broadcast discovery, Layer 2 connectivity, or BAS-specific protocol awareness, Dispel's approach works well.

If your buildings run BACnet, Modbus, and Niagara — and your technicians need the same tools and workflows remotely that they use on-site — the BAS-specific approach fills gaps that generic OT remote access does not address.


SiteConduit is a managed remote access and monitoring platform purpose-built for building automation. Layer 2 connectivity, protocol firewalling, time-limited sessions, and 24/7 device monitoring — for BACnet, Modbus, and Niagara environments.

Join the waitlist for early access, or visit our FAQ for more details.

HB

Hayden Barker

Founder, SiteConduit — Idea Networks Inc.

Hayden has spent over a decade designing and deploying network infrastructure for building automation environments. He built SiteConduit after seeing firsthand how traditional VPNs and remote access tools fail to meet the security and operational needs of BAS integrators and building owners.

Purpose-Built Remote Access for Building Automation

Layer 2 BACnet connectivity, protocol firewalling, and time-limited sessions. Built specifically for BAS environments.

No spam. We'll only email you about SiteConduit access.